Maintaining current rates of vaccination

Dr Linda Calabresi

writer

Dr Linda Calabresi

GP; Medical Editor, Healthed

Claim CPD for this activity

Educational Activities (EA)
0 minutes

These are activities that expand general practice knowledge, skills and attitudes, related to your scope of practice.

Reviewing Performance (RP)
0 minutes

These are activities that require reflection on feedback about your work.

Measuring Outcomes (MO)
0 minutes

These are activities that use your work data to ensure quality results.

EA
0 minutes

These are activities that expand general practice knowledge, skills and attitudes, related to your scope of practice.

RP
0 minutes

These are activities that require reflection on feedback about your work.

MO
0 minutes

These are activities that use your work data to ensure quality results.

Dr Linda Calabresi

 

The COVID vaccine rollout is certainly moving forward admirably. Authorities are predicting at this rate we might reach our 70% target in November and the 80% target by the end of the year.

Of course this prediction relies heavily on maintaining current rates of vaccination, and it is well-recognised that there are many different factors that can and will affect these rates. Firstly access to the vaccine is an obvious rate-limiting step and no doubt explains low vaccine coverage in areas such as north western Australia and outback Queensland.

But also there are obviously other factors at play if one is to explain why certain areas of the major cities are lagging in their vaccine coverage compared to others. Many questions will be being asked, especially in Sydney in order to discover how to encourage vaccination in those areas that are dragging the chain, which incidentally tend to be those areas where the most recent outbreaks are occurring.

Healthed recently asked doctors what they thought might have the most impact on improving vaccination rates in Australia. Of the 828 GPs surveyed, almost three quarters (74.27%) believed a ‘vaccine passport’ would positively influence uptake and reduce the time needed to reach vaccination targets. The majority of the remainder were unsure of the impact of such an initiative and only 3% considering a passport might have a negative impact.

Interestingly, only 57% of GPs  thought giving patients a $300 vaccination incentive payment would positively affect the time taken to achieve vaccination targets, which tends to suggest GPs consider patients to be motivated more by freedom and access to travel than by money.

Icon 2

NEXT LIVE Webcast

:
Days
:
Hours
:
Minutes
Seconds
Expert panel - A/Prof Samantha Hocking, Prof John Dixon, facilitated by A/Prof Ralph Audehm

Expert panel - A/Prof Samantha Hocking, Prof John Dixon, facilitated by A/Prof Ralph Audehm

GLP-1 Prescribing Expert Panel Discussion

Prof Rukshen Weerasooriya

Prof Rukshen Weerasooriya

Arrhythmia Management in Primary Care

Dr Rupert Hinds

Dr Rupert Hinds

Infant Allergy Cases

Join us for the next free webcast for GPs and healthcare professionals

High quality lectures delivered by leading independent experts

Share this

Share this

Dr Linda Calabresi

writer

Dr Linda Calabresi

GP; Medical Editor, Healthed

Test your knowledge

Recent articles

Latest GP poll

In general, do you support allowing non-GPs to refer to specialists in certain situations?

Yes, if the referral process involves meaningful collaboration with GPs

0%

Yes

0%

No

0%

Recent podcasts

Listen to expert interviews.
Click to open in a new tab

Find your area of interest

Once you confirm you’ve read this article you can complete a Patient Case Review to earn 0.5 hours CPD in the Reviewing Performance (RP) category.

Select ‘Confirm & learn‘ when you have read this article in its entirety and you will be taken to begin your Patient Case Review.