What GPs think of the prospect of a Medicare audit

Dr Linda Calabresi

writer

Dr Linda Calabresi

GP; Medical Editor, Healthed

Claim CPD for this activity

Educational Activities (EA)
0 minutes

These are activities that expand general practice knowledge, skills and attitudes, related to your scope of practice.

Reviewing Performance (RP)
0 minutes

These are activities that require reflection on feedback about your work.

Measuring Outcomes (MO)
0 minutes

These are activities that use your work data to ensure quality results.

EA
0 minutes

These are activities that expand general practice knowledge, skills and attitudes, related to your scope of practice.

RP
0 minutes

These are activities that require reflection on feedback about your work.

MO
0 minutes

These are activities that use your work data to ensure quality results.

Dr Linda Calabresi

 

It is little wonder that most Australian GPs confess to feeling anxious at the prospect of a Medicare audit.

As the result of a recent Healthed survey of over 1000 Australian GPs showed, much confusion and uncertainty exists in many areas associated with what is deemed as ‘appropriate’ billing of Medicare.

Take for example the Medicare rule that the patient must give explicit consent before they can be legally bulk-billed. Did you know that? If you didn’t you’re not alone. According to the online survey less than half of all GPs (47.92%) were aware such a rule existed.

And of those who knew of this rule, there were still inconsistencies in how the term ‘explicit consent’ was interpreted. About one in 10 GPs (11.06%) got patients to sign a DB020 form in which the item number being billed was identified. The rest relied on a more vague sign of agreement on the part of the patient – namely verbal consent to the staff or implied consent by agreeing to the consultation.

One wonders how many times ‘explicit consent’ is obtained with the new telehealth consultations, but in these days of electronic note taking, where the length of time a patient’s file remains open is documented you would think it would be very easy to investigate if there was a discrepancy between the service being billed and the service that was delivered.

Surely checking patient consent for a consult to be bulk-billed would not be of interest to the PSR when doing an audit? You wouldn’t think so, but why is such a descriptor still there – yet another example of an anxiety-provoking anomaly that so characterises the Medicare item number descriptors.

No wonder GPs feel anxious when the PSR gets in touch!

Icon 2

NEXT LIVE Webcast

:
Days
:
Hours
:
Minutes
Seconds
A/Prof Alberto Pinzon Charry

A/Prof Alberto Pinzon Charry

Urticaria Management in Primary Care

A/Prof Ron Dick

A/Prof Ron Dick

LDL Management Demystified

A/Prof Samantha Hocking

A/Prof Samantha Hocking

Tirzepatide for Chronic Weight Management

Dr Rupert Hinds

Dr Rupert Hinds

Diarrhoea in Kids – When to Worry

Join us for the next free webcast for GPs and healthcare professionals

High quality lectures delivered by leading independent experts

Share this

Share this

Dr Linda Calabresi

writer

Dr Linda Calabresi

GP; Medical Editor, Healthed

Test your knowledge

Recent articles

Latest GP poll

We asked GPs views on the Government's proposal to withhold MBS payments from pathology companies when they don't upload results to My Health Record

I support the proposal

0%

I support the proposal, but the Government should improve the useability of My Health Record first

0%

I do not support the proposal

0%

Recent podcasts

Listen to expert interviews.
Click to open in a new tab

Find your area of interest

Once you confirm you’ve read this article you can complete a Patient Case Review to earn 0.5 hours CPD in the Reviewing Performance (RP) category.

Select ‘Confirm & learn‘ when you have read this article in its entirety and you will be taken to begin your Patient Case Review.