Articles

Read the latest articles relevant to your clinical practice, including exclusive insights from Healthed surveys and polls.

By reading selected clinical articles, you earn CPD in the Educational Activities (EA) category whenever you click the “Claim CPD” button and follow the prompts. 

Dr Daman Langguth

Coeliac disease is a common disorder affecting the gastrointestinal tract, secondary to an immunologic reaction to gluten. At present it can only be managed by lifelong avoidance of gluten, and thus presents a challenge for patients and their health care professionals.

Epidemiology

Coeliac disease was first characterised in the late 1940s with diarrhoea and failure to thrive in young children. The wartime shortage of wheat, and adoption of a gluten-free surrogate diet, allowed their symptoms to improve. When wheat was re-introduced into their diets their condition worsened again. Initially thought to be a rare disease of children, we now recognise coeliac disease to be prevalent in adults, including the elderly. Data from the UK reveal that the most common age group diagnosed is between 30 and 45, with more people over 60 than those under 16 years (Coeliac UK: www.coeliac.co.uk). The illness occurs in people of European, Turkish, Middle Eastern, Egyptian and Indian backgrounds. It appears to be rare in sub-Saharan Africa and South-East Asia. There is debate over mass screening in populations such as in the UK and Scandinavia, where the disease incidence approaches 1%. The Gastroenterological Society of Australia (GESA) recommends screening in persons with Type 1 diabetes mellitus, Down syndrome, Turner syndrome, immunoglobulin A (IgA) deficiency, or a family history of coeliac disease, where the condition may be as common as 1 in 10.

Immunopathology

The pathologic understanding of coeliac disease has advanced considerably over the past 10 years, although our understanding is still incomplete. In some individuals, when gluten is digested the peptides cross the intestinal mucosa where they are recognised by the mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue. Those individuals with HLA-DQ2 or -DQ8 are able to process the gluten peptides, resulting in presentation of gliadin/gluten peptides on the surface of antigen-presenting cells. Over 99% of coeliac patients have HLA-DQ2 or -DQ8, and homozygotes for DQ2/8 are more likely than heterozygotes to develop the disease, and more severely. For the peptides to be presented to T cells, they must first be deamidated by a ubiquitous enzyme, tissue transglutaminase (tTG). Tissue transglutaminase alters the gluten-derived peptide so that it remains in the binding site of the HLA molecule, and allows an immune response to occur against the enterocytes that carry the HLADQ2/8-gluten peptide complex. Tissue transglutaminase is present in an active form outside cells; its usual role is to help maintain the extra-cellular matrix. Several isoenzymes of tTG exist throughout the body, tTG2 being present in the GI tract. It is the presence of IgA antibodies to this enzyme— anti-tTG2 antibodies (hereafter ‘tTG antibodies’)—that have become the gold standard serologic marker for coeliac disease. It remains uncertain why antibodies to tTG develop in coeliac patients, although research suggests that tTG can become cross-linked to the gluten peptide and cause specific tTG antibodies to develop, through a process termed ‘epitope spreading’. Tissue transglutaminase antibodies have been shown to pre-date the development of the histologic changes of coeliac disease. It is clear that antibodies to tTG are not pathogenic in most patients, as many cells in the body contain similar tTG. However, in dermatitis herpetiformis, a disease long associated with coeliac disease, these antibodies develop against tTG3 (whereas in coeliac disease they are directed against tTG2). In dermatitis herpetiformis, these tTG3 antibodies may well be pathogenic, leading to classic cutaneous lesions.

Serologic testing

IgA tTG antibodies are now considered the gold standard in the detection of coeliac disease, giving a sensitivity of around 95%, and a specificity of around 90%. IgA tTG antibodies become negative 9–12 months after the introduction of a gluten-free diet. In children less than 2 years of age, IgA production is not mature and may result in false negative IgA tTG. This is especially true for those less than one year of age. At present, all serologic diagnoses should be confirmed by histologic diagnosis, as false positives can occur. Although several studies in children have indicated that very high IgA anti-tTG results may not need to be confirmed by biopsy, Australian guidelines indicate the need for histologic confirmation. IgG tTG antibodies may also be detected in coeliac patients, though they have similar problems to IgG anti-gliadin antibodies (AGA, discussed below), with a poor sensitivity and specificity, despite initial enthusiasm for their utility. Older serologic tests for coeliac disease were based on antibodies directed against gliadin—anti-gliadin antibodies (IgA AGA and IgG AGA). Like all food antibodies, they have relatively poor sensitivity (false negatives) and particularly poor specificity (false positives), especially given that they are a group of antibodies (polyclonal), rather than being directed against a single epitope. The indication for IgA AGA is very limited and should largely be consigned to history. However, these antibodies can be used to monitor early adherence to a gluten-free diet as they become negative 6–9 months after the diet is introduced. IgG AGA, however, remains of use in IgA-deficient patients in whom IgA tTG and IgA AGA are not produced. IgG against deamidated gliadin is of use in IgA-deficient patients in whom IgA tTG and IgA AGA are not produced. This is a modified test, using a gliadin peptide (small piece of protein) that had been altered to more closely resemble the natural peptide found in wheat. IgA deficiency is defined as ‘undetectable or barely detectable’ serum IgA. IgG AGA are also of use in children less than two years of age (and especially children under one), in whom the ability to produce IgA antibodies has not fully developed. All patients with IgA deficiency in whom coeliac disease is suspected should undergo a small bowel biopsy, regardless of the IgG AGA and other testing conducted. It is suggested they be referred to a gastroenterologist, as other diseases such as chronic giardia and autoimmune enteritis may occur. One theory to explain why IgA deficiency is associated with the development of coeliac disease is that IgA is involved in the neutralisation of foreign antigens at mucosal surfaces, and these deficient individuals have greater transmucosal passage of gliadin fragments. Another type of antibody, IgA endomysial antibodies, has also been used to test for the disease in the past. These antibodies were first detected in monkey oesophagus; it is now recognised that the antigen being detected by this method was tTG. These antibodies are highly specific (~ 100%) but have a slightly lower sensitivity (~ 90%) than IgA tTG. Endomysial antibodies are sometimes used in children under two years of age.

Tissue typing

In selected cases, HLA-DQ typing may be of benefit. In patients who are predisposed to the development of coeliac disease, a negative test would essentially rule out the diagnosis. A positive result, on the other hand, would not significantly alter the chance of the person having coeliac disease. In Down syndrome and Turner syndrome patients, this would alleviate the need for life-long screening. Tissue typing may be of value in infants (less than two years), to exclude disease, as serologic markers are less reliable. HLA-DQ typing in relatives of coeliac patients may also be of use, although they are highly likely to have DQ2/8 present, whether or not they also have the disease. As DQ2 is independently associated with IgA deficiency and Type 1 diabetes, tissue typing would be less beneficial in such cases.
General Practice Pathology is a new regular column each authored by an Australian expert pathologist on a topic of particular relevance and interest to practising GPs. The authors provide this editorial, free of charge as part of an educational initiative developed and coordinated by Sonic Pathology.
Dr Linda Calabresi

The increasing BMI of first-time pregnant women is behind a rise in adverse perinatal outcomes over a 25 year time period, a new retrospective Australian study suggests. Analysing data from one major Sydney teaching hospital, researchers found that the prevalence of overweight among women having their first baby increased from 12.7% in 1990-94 to 16.4% in 2010-14, and that of obesity rose from 4.8% to 7.3%. More importantly they found this increase in BMI was associated with a range of adverse perinatal outcomes particularly pre-eclampsia, macrosomia and gestational diabetes. Other complications believed to have increased as a result of the maternal weight gain included caesarean deliveries, post partum haemorrhage, prematurity, admission to the special care nursery and fetal abnormalities. “We found that a substantial proportion of the burden of adverse perinatal outcomes for Australian women is linked to maternal overweight and obesity, and that this proportion has steadily increased over the past 25 years,” the Sydney researchers said. The study involved the analysis of the data recorded on over 42000 singleton births delivered to previously nulliparous women at the Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Sydney between 1990 and 2014. Interestingly over the course of the study period, the mean age for first time mothers rose from 28.7 to 31.6 years, however having adjusted for this as well as other possible confounders such as changing smoking rates, socioeconomic status, and country of birth of the mother the findings confirmed the relative risks of adverse perinatal outcomes had increased in association with rising prevalence of overweight and obesity. Researchers calculated that should overweight or obese women move down one BMI category (for example from obese to overweight) 19% of pre-eclampsia, 15.9% of macrosomia and 14.2% of gestational diabetes could be averted. “Our results indicate that the frequency of adverse perinatal outcomes could be reduced by shifting the distribution of overweight and obesity among first-time mothers by a single BMI class. Investing in obesity prevention strategies that target women prior to their becoming pregnant is likely to provide the greatest benefit,” they concluded. Ref: MJA doi:10.5694/mja17.00344

Prof Allen Cheng

In an attempt to avoid a repeat of last year’s horror flu season, Health Minister Greg Hunt yesterday announced the government would fund two new flu vaccines in 2018 to try to better protect the elderly. While influenza affects people of all ages, infections among the elderly are more likely to require hospitalisation or cause serious complications such as pneumonia and heart attacks. Of the 1,100 Australians who died last year from flu-related causes, 90% were aged 65 and over. The two free vaccines for over-65s work in different ways: FluZone High Dose is a high-dose version; Fluad adds an additional ingredient to boost its effectiveness. Both are recommended for use only in people aged 65 and over. But neither is perfect. And it’s important to remember flu vaccines are, at best, only partially protective.

Why do we need new vaccines for flu?

Australia’s National Immunisation Program provides free influenza vaccine for the elderly, as well as other high-risk groups including pregnant women, those with chronic diseases and Indigenous Australians.
Read more: Flu vaccine won't definitely stop you from getting the flu, but it's more important than you think
Older people’s immune systems don’t respond to flu vaccines as well as younger people’s. Recent studies have also shown that flu vaccines don’t appear to be as effective in the elderly at protecting against flu and its complications. Compounding this problem is that the flu subtype that tends to affect older people (A/H3N2) is different to that which affects younger people (A/H1N1). Although the seasonal flu vaccine now contains four strains to cover all the relevant subtypes present, the protection against H3N2 infection appears to be poorer than against other strains. Two strategies are attempting to improve the effectiveness of flu vaccines. One is to increase the dose of the flu strains in the vaccine. This is the basis for Sanofi’s High Dose FluZone vaccine, which contains four times the amount of flu antigen than the standard dose. Another way is to add a substance that improves the immune response, known as an adjuvant, in combination with the flu strains. This is the basis for Seqirus’ (CSL) Fluad vaccine, which contains the adjuvant MF59. This vaccine has been used overseas for many years, but has only been become available in Australia this year.

How much better are these vaccines than the current vaccine?

Compared to the standard flu vaccine, the high-dose version has been shown to better stimulate the immune system of older users to make protective antibodies. It has been shown to better reduce rates of flu infection in over-65s than the standard vaccine. And, interestingly, it also seems to protect against pneumonia. One common criticism of clinical trials is that they don’t include the types of people who are found in the “real world”. But population based observational studies suggest that the high-dose vaccine is more protective than the standard-dose vaccine where H3N2 is the predominant circulating strain – as it was last year.
Read more: Here's why the 2017 flu season was so bad
What about the Fluad (adjuvanated) vaccine? Compared to the standard vaccine, adjuvanted flu vaccine has been shown to better stimulate the immune system of older users to make protective antibodies. Unlike the high-dose vaccine, there have not been clinical trials that show a difference in infection rates compared with the standard vaccine. But observational data suggests the adjuvanted vaccine is more protective against hospitalisation with influenza or pneumonia – to a similar degree as the high-dose vaccine. One problem with both these vaccines is that they only contain three strains, rather than the four strains in the current vaccine. The strain missing from the new vaccines is an influenza B type. But the benefits of better protection against the most common three strains in the new vaccine appear to outweigh the potential loss of protection against the missing B strain.

Are the new vaccines safe?

Both vaccines are safe, but commonly cause mild side effects, and very rarely can cause serious side effects. However, these risks from the vaccine are less than from getting influenza infection. The main side effect of vaccines relates to their effect in stimulating the immune system. In many people they cause a sore arm and, less commonly, a fever. The side effects of these new flu vaccines are slightly more common than with standard vaccines. Generally, these side effects are mild and don’t last long. None of the flu vaccines used in Australia contains live virus and therefore can’t cause flu infection. However, the vaccination season (April to June) usually occurs around the same time as when another respiratory virus (RSV) circulates, so this respiratory infection is commonly misattributed to vaccination.
Read more: Health Check: when is 'the flu' really a cold?
Rare but serious side effects, such as Guillain Barre Syndrome (where the immune system attacks nerves), have been described after flu vaccination. Studies suggest that the risk of these side effects are less common after the flu vaccine than after flu infection. People with allergies should discuss flu vaccines with their doctor. In the past, there has been concern that the flu vaccines, which are manufactured in eggs, may elicit allergic reactions in people with egg allergy. However, it is now thought that people with egg allergies can receive flu vaccines safely under appropriate supervision. In 2009, an adjuvanted vaccine (Pandemrix) was thought to be implicated in cases of narcolepsy (a disease associated with excessive sleepiness) in Europe. However, this primarily occurred in children (rather than the elderly), and with a different adjuvant (ASO3) than is being used in Fluad (MF59)

Which vaccine should I get?

The two vaccines have not been compared head to head, so it isn’t known which one is better. The available data suggest they are similar to each other. In practice, what vaccine you’ll receive will depend on what’s available at your GP or pharmacy. It is important to note that these vaccines are only recommended for use in people 65 years of age or older, and are not recommended for use in people under this age. The standard vaccine will still be available for younger people. There are no data to support the use of multiple doses of vaccines of the same or different types.
Read more: Flu is a tragic illness. How can we get more people to vaccinate?
Neither of the new vaccines is perfect – they simply reduce your risk of getting flu to a slightly greater effect than the standard vaccine. Like other flu vaccines, there is still the chance that the vaccine strains don’t match what’s circulating. The ConversationDespite the common perception that the flu is mild illness, it causes a significant number of deaths worldwide. To make an impact on this, we need better vaccines, better access to vaccines worldwide and new strategies, such as increasing the rate of vaccination in childhood. Allen Cheng, Professor in Infectious Diseases Epidemiology, Monash University This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.
Dr Linda Calabresi

Opioids have really fallen out of favour as a chronic pain relief option. Even for patients with severe chronic back pain, or severe pain from their osteoarthritis in their hip or knee, opioids will not offer any better relief in terms of pain-restricted function that non-opioid medication, a recent study published in JAMA has shown. The US clinical trial involved 240 US adults with moderate to severe chronic back pain or hip or knee osteoarthritis pain despite analgesic.  Researchers compared whether treatment with opioids such as morphine, oxycodone or hydrocodone/paracetamol improved pain-related function over a 12-month period over treatment with nonopioid such as paracetamol or an NSAID. Surprisingly, the results showed no significant difference in terms of pain related function over the course of the study. In fact, the pain intensity was significantly better in the nonopioid group over the 12-month period, however the study authors said the clinical importance of this finding was unclear. As was perhaps more expected, the group that took opioids had more side effects. “Overall, opioids did not demonstrate any advantage over nonopioid medication that could potentially outweigh their greater risk of harms,” the researchers said. When looking at all the results – even including secondary outcomes,  the only area where opioids were found to be superior to nonopioids in this study of chronic pain patients was in the area of anxiety. The opioid group had fewer anxiety symptoms – so they had just as little function, and even more intense pain but they worried about it less. The study authors said their findings added to the growing body of evidence that opioids offer little benefit over other medications and even placebo in the management of chronic pain conditions, especially when their side effect profile is taken into consideration. “Results do not support initiation of opioid therapy for moderate to severe chronic back pain or hip or knee osteoarthritis pain”, they concluded. Ref: JAMA 2018;319(9) 872-882. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.0899

Dr Vivienne Miller

Let us imagine that there has been a significant side-effect from a contraceptive choice occurs and a patient suffers harm. It is a known but very rare side-effect. How much legal and ethical responsibility lies with the doctor who prescribes the contraceptive, how much lies with the medical experts advocating this form of contraception as reasonable and safe, and how much lies with the pharmaceutical company who researched this product? Should this contraceptive be withdrawn from use, and if so, why would it be still available and advised for use in other countries around the world? A reasonable response to this question would include an assessment of the incidence of this particular complication among all users of this contraceptive, the incidence of any other significant complications, and the outcome for the patients of these complications. However, let us imagine the media finds this story and runs with it, giving widespread coverage of this single case and highlighting the contraceptive as the cause. This is the situation at present with the progestogen IUD, Mirena® in the United States. It is also the case with oral contraceptive pills that contain cyproterone acetate (such as Diane-35®) in Australia. Contraceptive pills like Diane-35® are more oestrogenic in their balance and this could potentially increase their risk of venous-thromboembolism (VTE), although this still remains somewhat controversial. It was temporarily banned in France because of this in 2013. However, the risks need to be put in perspective. Even if the worst case-scenario is accepted, the actual increased risk of VTE for these newer pills over older types is an extra four to six VTEs per 10,000 Pill users per year.1 “The risk of death from a VTE induced by a combined oral contraceptive is approximately one in 100,000, significantly less than the risk during pregnancy,” said Dr Foran. It is known that oral contraceptive pills containing 35ug ethinyl oestradiol and cyproterone acetate are being prescribed in Australia for indications beyond contraception, namely androgenising signs in women.  It is also known, that for some women these pills provide the best control of their symptoms. In Europe, the regulatory authorities decided that the benefits outweighed the rare risks for properly selected patients and this OCP was quickly reintroduced to the market after only six months. However, in Australia there have recently been calls for the banning or restriction of this product in Australia following the diagnosis of a VTE in a young woman. How reasonable is it in our society to allow the traumatic stories of individuals to override medical opinion and determine regulation? The public needs to be made to realise that not only are these products very safe for the overwhelming majority of women, when prescribed appropriately, but they are also so much safer for women than an unplanned pregnancy would be. It might be valid to argue that there are other combined oral contraceptives that are ‘safer’ than those containing 35ug ethinyl oestradiol and cyproterone acetate, or that cyproterone acetate is available separately for use. However, what happens when one of these other oral contraceptive choices causes a major medical event in a different woman? In the UK, doctors have been advised to warn patients that there is an increased risk of VTE with Femodene®, Marvelon® and Yasmin® named as some examples. The Daily Mail UK1 had a massive heading to this effect: “Deadly risk of pill used by one million women: Every GP in Britain told to warn about threat from popular contraceptive” If media and legal pressure is allowed to result in the withdrawal of these medications, at some stage, there will be no oral contraceptive choices left. The seriousness of the situation is highlighted in the case of the Mirena® IUD, since there is no similar alternative to this product in Australia. In the United States, this contraceptive device has been under a cloud of bad publicity since 2009, due to US Food and Drug Administration warnings relating to migration and perforation. Since then, the Mirena® IUD has been scrutinised by patients with side-effects and, of course, lawyers. “The real question here is whether hysterectomy or endometrial ablation is a safer option than the Mirena® IUD for women with heavy menstrual bleeding.” Dr Foran. The maintenance of a range of choices is important and women should have the right to make these decisions for themselves in consultation with their doctors. The Mirena IUD is also a safe form of contraception, especially for women who have thrombophilias and for older premenopausal women, most of whose other choices are less safe. Is it still enough for doctors to fully inform women of the side-effects and complications of their contraceptive options and to let them decide, or is modern contraception becoming a very personal, public and legal battlefield, the main casualties of this being expert medical advice and a woman’s choice?  …and in the end, who is left holding the baby?  
  1. Bitzer J et al. Statement on combined hormonal contraceptives containing third- or fourth-generation progestogens or cyproterone acetate and the associated risk of thromboembolism. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. doi: 10. 1136/ jfprhc-2013-100624 http://srh.bmj.com/content/familyplanning/early/2013/04/10/jfprhc-2013-100624.full.pdf
  2. Daily Mail, UK, 22nd Feb 2018 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2550216/Deadly-risk-pill-used-1m-women-Every-GP-Britain-told-warn-threat-popular-contraceptive.html
  This article is based on an interview with Dr Terri Foran, Sexual Health Physician, Lecturer with the UNSW’s School of Women’s and Children’s Health and Director of Master Women’s Health Medicine on Saturday 17th February 2018 at the Annual Women’s and Children’s Health Update, Sydney

Dr Linda Calabresi

Post-menopausal women experiencing vulvovaginal symptoms will benefit just as much from using the cheapest over-the-counter lubricant or moisturiser as using topical oestrogen, a new study suggests. The 12-week randomised clinical trial, published in JAMA Internal Medicine, compared the efficacy of a low-dose vaginal oestradiol tablet and a vaginal moisturiser, each versus placebo among a group of over 300 post-menopausal women with moderate to severe vulvovaginal symptoms. To determine the effectiveness of the treatment women were asked to report on the severity of their ‘most bothersome symptom’ which included pain with vaginal penetration (60%), dryness (21%), itching (7%), irritation (6%) and pain (5%). Across the board, regardless of which treatment was used, most women had a decrease of at least 50% in symptom severity over the course of the study. This was significant in light of the fact that most women said they ‘frequently’ or ‘always’ distressed about their sex life at enrolment, whereas after the 12-week study nearly half said they were ‘rarely’ or ‘never’ distressed. “No treatment group differences in symptom reduction were observed for vaginal oestradiol tablet plus placebo gel vs dual placebo, or vaginal moisturiser plus placebo tablet vs dual placebo”, the US researchers reported. And it didn’t matter if the most bothersome symptom was dyspareunia or itching, it appeared the hormone treatment or the specific vaginal moisturiser (Replens) had no advantage over the placebo combination. According to the study authors, the placebo gel used in the study had a similar pH and viscosity as the vaginal moisturiser (Replens) but was less mucoadhesive. The fact that both formulations were equally effective in reducing symptoms suggests that the mucoadhesive properties are less important than previously thought. Similarly, markers of vaginal oestrogenisation such as the vaginal maturation index, did, naturally improve more with the topical oestrogen but this did not translate into a greater benefit in terms of symptoms over placebo. As an accompanying editorial points out, “ultimately, it is improvement in symptoms rather than surrogates such as tissue markers that should define the goal of care.” And while the study authors conclude that treatment choice for women with troublesome postmenopausal vulvovaginal symptoms should be ‘based on individual patient preferences regarding cost and formulation’ the editorial authors go in much stronger. “[P]ostmenopausal women experiencing vulvovaginal symptoms should choose the cheapest moisturiser or lubricant available over the counter – at least until new evidence arises to suggest there is any benefit to doing otherwise.” Ref: JAMA Intern Med. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.0116 JAMA Intern Med. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.0094

Dr Vivienne Miller

How easy is it to say HFpEF and HFrEF?   The answer is… not very easy! However, heart failure has a new classification based on ejection fraction that doctors will need to know about. HFpEF stands for “heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.” This preserved ejection fraction is defined as greater than or equal to 50%. HFrEF stands for “heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.” This is the “classic” form of heart failure that doctors are familiar with. The ejection fraction in HRrEF is defined as less than or equal to 50%. Patients who have clinical signs of heart failure and a normal ejection fraction used to be diagnosed with diastolic heart failure.  They are now said, under the new classification, to have HFpEF. It should be noted that a patient may have diastolic dysfunction typically reported on echo, however if they do not have any clinical signs of heart failure they do NOT have HFpEF. In this situation, the diastolic dysfunction refers to the cardiac echo finding of impaired diastolic relaxation. This may be an age-related change or due to left ventricular hypertrophy, both of which may occur without necessarily causing symptoms and signs of heart failure. There is an additional group that some researchers refer to, and that is HFmEF, which stands for “heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction”. HFmEF is defined as an ejection fraction of between 40% and 50%. There is debate about the utility of the additional sub-classification of HFmEF. Most clinicians would consider HFmEF as simply mild HFrEF. Most agree that HFmEF simply identifies as subgroup of HFrEF for which there are fewer clinical trials or evidence for effective therapy, and so this highlights areas for future investigation and research. The utility of this new classification, particularly HFrEF versus HFpEF, is mainly to distinguish different pathophysiological processes, cardiac mechanics and treatment options. Presently, it is only HFrEF for which there exists medications that reduce mortality and improve survival. Additionally, device therapies such as implantable cardioverter defibrillators and biventricular pacemakers (now more commonly referred to as “cardiac resynchronisation therapies”) have only demonstrated benefit in HFrEF. For HFpEF, there are no medications or devices that have been shown to reduce mortality and improve survival. Typically, symptoms are managed with diuretic therapy. There is evidence to support a benefit from spironolactone, however the most recent trial (TOPCAT)1 failed to demonstrate a mortality benefit and it was plagued with disparities regarding the nature of recruitment in one of the large regions participating. Certainly, from a treatment viewpoint, the underlying causes contributing to HFpEF can often be managed. These typically include hypertension, diabetes, obesity and coronary artery disease. Not surprisingly, there are studies to show that patients with HFpEF do benefit from exercise, and from maintaining a healthy weight. But how best do we explain these definitions to the patient sitting in front of us? 'It can be very helpful to clarify the term [heart failure] and to explain that their heart has neither “failed”, nor has it “stopped working”, but that “it is just not working as well as normal”, said cardiologist, Dr Hendrik Zimmet. HFrEF can be explained as “the heart muscle not pumping as well as usual”. HFpEF can be explained as “the heart muscle being stiffer than usual, and not relaxing as well”. But no matter how the problem is explained to the patient, it is important to stress, as positively as possible, what can be done to help.
  1. Pfeffer, Marc et al. Regional Variation in Patients and Outcomes in the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure With an Aldosterone Antagonist (TOPCAT) Trial
Circulation. 2014; CIRCULATIONAHA.114.013255 Originally published November 18, 2014 https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.013255 Based on an interview with cardiologist, Dr Hendrik Zimmet at the Annual Women and Children’s Health Update, Melbourne, March 2018

Dr Vivienne Miller

Based on an interview with endocrinologist and obesity expert, Professor Joseph Proietto at the Annual Women and Children’s Health Update, Melbourne, March 2018 There are many reasons proposed for our society becoming more overweight than ever before. The commonest explanation is that people are overeating because they have more refined, energy dense foods easily available and requiring little physical effort to access. The other consideration is that people are not moving and exercising as much, due to increased sedentary employment and entertainments that are clearly less effort. Once people become overweight, they feel less like exercising and so the situation worsens. Unfortunately, in our society, food (including alcohol), socialising and entertainment are all strongly associated. Food is easily obtained and is abundant in variety and quantity. Previous generations ate less because of cost, availability and the fact that food generally plainer and perhaps less tasty. This was especially true for the poorer in society, who also tended to have more physically demanding jobs, with less time and money to spend on eating during the day. On a scientific level, genetics and epigenetics are now known to play an important role in the development of obesity. In particular, there are many genes currently being researched in relation to appetite and obesity including leptin (a hormone made mostly by adipose cells that inhibits hunger) and its receptor, and the melanocortin 4 receptor. "For obvious evolutionary reasons, there are no genes (yet) identified that reduce metabolic rate," said Professor Joseph Proietto. So far, all genes that have been found to be associated with obesity have been linked to increased hunger. There are no genes known that reduce metabolism. It is interesting that force-feeding increases energy expenditure while weight loss reduces energy expenditure and, in both cases, it is spontaneous activity that changes, with only minor alteration in basal metabolic rate. This has been demonstrated in overfeeding experiments. Some causes of obesity may be epigenetic. For example, some women who gain excess weight during pregnancy find it more difficult to lose after the pregnancy. This is likely to be due to epigenetic change in the expression of genes connected with obesity. Unfortunately, the offspring of mothers who become overweight before or during pregnancy are likely to inherit these genes, and hence themselves have trouble with weight gain. Certain medical conditions (hypothyroidism, Cushing's syndrome) may induce modest weight gain, but the extreme numbers of people in our society with serious weight problems mean that endocrinological causes are very much in the minority. Hence, we need to look for other causes for obesity in the modern age. One of the biggest problems with healthy lifestyle programmes and extensive community information about diet, weight and exercise in our society is that genetics trump willpower in many cases, especially over the long-term. Following weight loss there are hormonal changes that lead to increased hunger (leptin levels fall and ghrelin levels increase) and in 2011 these changes were shown to be long lasting, so the weight-reduced individual has to fight increased hunger. Given the prolific amount of available food, temptation adds to the problem. In effect, one is then fighting nature.

Dr Linda Calabresi

Children who persistently or frequently experience high anxiety need help, says psychologist Jennie Hudson, Professor and Director of the Centre for Emotional Health, at Sydney’s Macquarie University. “There has been a tendency to believe kids are going to grow out of [their anxiety]”, she said. In the past, anxiety in children was believed to be normal part of growing up. In fact, in the first Australian Child and Adolescent Mental Health survey in 1998, the question of anxiety disorders in children was not included at all. But the reality is, anxious children grow into anxious teenagers and then into anxious adults, and by then it is not only harder to treat it is also too late to reverse much of the negative impact this condition has had on these people’s lives, she explained in an interview following her presentation on the subject at HealthEd’s Mental Health in General Practice evening seminar held recently in Sydney. “Children need strategies to manage their anxiety now,” she said. “We, as health professionals need to be encouraging parents to seek help if they feel their child’s anxiety is interfering with their life.” For GPs who are wondering about the most appropriate advice to give parents of anxious children, a key principle is to encourage children not to avoid tasks or situations they fear. Parents need to support their child in facing the situations that make them afraid, even if it is ‘bit by bit’, and celebrate each time they manage to accomplish even part of a feared task be it at school, sport or socially. “There is a natural tendency for a parent to protect their child from feeling anxious – they will answer for the child who gets worried about replying or say they don’t need to give the speech in class that is making them nervous for example” but this tends to fuel the anxiety. By enabling the child to practise avoidance, the parent is inadvertently endorsing the child’s belief that this is something to be feared. Another important principle in managing anxiety in children is to try and get the child to identify their worried thoughts, what it is that they fear is going to happen. Commonly a child will catastrophise the consequences of a situation for example “failing this maths test means my life will be ruined”. Once the fear is described the parent and child can discuss, logically why this feared consequence is unlikely to happen. “We call it ‘detective thinking’ – encouraging the child to develop strategies to undertake a realistic appraisal of the situation,” Professor Hudson explained. In terms of resources available for parents, there are a number Professor Hudson recommends. “Helping Your Anxious Child: A Step-by-Step Guide for Parents,” written by Australian psychologists Ronald Rapee, Ann Wignall, Susan Spence, Vanessa Cobham, and Heidi Lyneham is practical, relevant and up-to-date. Another good option is “Helping Your Child with Fears and Worries 2nd Edition: A self-help guide for parents” written by UK experts in anxiety, Cathy Creswell and Lucy Willetts. As well as written material, there are some online programs and resources available, Professor  Hudson said. Macquarie University, Sydney has developed a couple of online programs, one called Cool Kids for 7-16-year-olds (https://www.mq.edu.au/about/campus-services-and-facilities/hospital-and-clinics/centre-for-emotional-health-clinic/programs-for-children-and-teenagers#Online) and another called Cool Little Kids (https://coollittlekids.org.au/ ) for children aged seven and under. Another good, evidence-based, online program is Brave (http://www.brave-online.com/) designed for 7-16-year-olds, and developed by researchers at the University of Queensland. Useful fact sheets for parents are available from the Macquarie University’s,  Centre for Emotional Health website (https://www.mq.edu.au/research/research-centres-groups-and-facilities/healthy-people/centres/centre-for-emotional-health-ceh/resources) as well as the Raising Children: The Australian parenting website (www.raisingchildren.net.au) For children with anxiety, CBT is recommended as the first line of treatment. As the risk of adverse effects with CBT is negligible it is recommended that treatment in children be commenced early on the basis of concern of the parent, carer or health professional. There are a number of reliable screening measures for anxiety in children, including the Spence Children’s Anxiety Scale (www.scaswebsite.com). The SCAS has a parent, child and teacher report along with Australian norms for 6-18-year-olds. The DASS21 is a reliable screening and monitoring tool for older adolescents. Currently in Australia only two of the SSRIs, fluvoxamine and sertraline, are approved for use in children and adolescents with obsessive compulsive disorder, Professor Hudson said. “There have been trials in Australia and the US combining CBT and sertraline. In our study, combining CBT and sertraline did not improve outcomes over and above CBT and placebo for children and adolescents with anxiety,” she added.

Dr Linda Calabresi

Among low-risk, nulliparous women, inducing a pregnancy at 39 weeks will not only be at least as safe as letting nature run its course but it will reduce the risk of having a Caesarean, according to US research. According to the randomised trial involving over 6000 women, those who were assigned to ‘expectant management’ ended up having a median gestational age of 40 weeks exactly, not a huge difference from the median gestational age of the induction group which was 39.3 weeks. However, the main aim of the study was to determine if induction at 39 weeks resulted in more adverse perinatal outcomes including conditions such as perinatal death, need for respiratory support, Apgars of less than three at five minutes, intracranial haemorrhage and the like. This potential association has been the concern which has dictated what is currently common obstetric practice. “When gestation is between 39 weeks 0 days and 40 weeks 6 days, common practice has been to avoid elective labour induction because of a lack of evidence of perinatal benefit and concern about a higher frequency of Caesarean delivery and other possible adverse maternal outcomes, particularly among nulliparous women”, the study authors said in the new England Journal of Medicine. What they found in their study however, was that these adverse perinatal outcomes occurred in only 4.3% of the babies born in the induction group and in 5.4% of those born to mothers who went into labour naturally. It appears the relative risk was reduced by 20%. And even though the induction group tended to have longer labours they had quicker recovery times and shorter hospital stays. In terms of maternal outcomes, induction at 39 weeks was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of both Caesarean section and hypertensive disorders of pregnancies. The researchers estimated one Caesarean would be avoided for every 28 low-risk, first-time mothers induced at 39 weeks. The study authors suggest that these findings have the capacity to change practice, or at the very least, provide evidence to relook at current obstetric practice policies. “These results suggest that policies aimed at the avoidance of elective labour induction among low-risk nulliparous women at 39 weeks of gestation are unlikely to reduce the rate of Caesarean delivery on a population level”, they concluded. Ref: NEJM 2018; 379:513-23 DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800566

Dr Linda Calabresi

The physical health of mentally ill patients is a "massive problem and we are doing very badly at it,” psychiatrist Dr Matthew Warden told doctors at a recent Healthed evening seminar in Sydney. In particular, the prevalence of high cardiovascular risk among patients with a history of psychosis, means this population was a "ticking time bomb", said Dr Warden, who is the Director of Acute Inpatient Services for Mental Health at St Vincent’s Hospital in Melbourne. Even without antipsychotic medication, a disproportionate number of people with a history of psychosis are overweight or obese, do very little if any physical exercise and smoke. And it is well-known that the metabolic side-effects associated with antipsychotic medications increases this cardiovascular risk enormously. Consequently, there has been growing pressure on psychiatrists to assess, monitor and manage the physical health of their patients with psychosis, but Dr Warden said, realistically this needs to be also done by GPs as they will usually be managing these patients long-term and "they are better at it.” Baseline metabolic measurements need to be taken at first episode of psychosis, including weight, BMI, BP, lipid levels, fasting blood sugar and smoking status. Weight, in particular needs to be monitored carefully following the commencement of antipsychotic medication, as weight gain is extremely common, especially with olanzapine which, Australia-wide is the most commonly prescribed antipsychotic. In answer to a GP’s question following his talk, Dr Ward said it is extremely difficult to avoid or reverse this medication-induced weight gain with diet and exercise alone. In addition, weight loss pharmacotherapy such as phentermine is contraindicated in people with a history of psychosis. Key to managing the weight gain issue was to choose an antipsychotic with the least long-term side effects from the outset. Olanzapine and clozapine are associated with the greatest weight gain while lurasidone and the partial agonists, aripiprazole and ziprasidone have the least effect on weight. Alternatively, for patients who may have been started on olanzapine or similar, swap to a more weight-neutral medication at the first sign they were gaining weight or developing other metabolic side-effects. It is more likely that a person who as gained weight on olanzapine, will lose that weight if switched to another weight-neutral medication early. The longer that patient stays on olanzapine and the weight gain is sustained, the harder it will be to shift even if the medication is changed, Dr Warden said. In addition to managing weight gain in mentally ill patients, Dr Warden also encouraged GPs to offer smoking cessation advice and help. Even though this population were often considered among the most dependent and heaviest smokers, his own research had found a significant number of patients could successfully quit or at the least cut down given the right advice and assistance. While most smoking cessation pharmacotherapy could be used, Dr Warden suggested that varenicline (Champix) was probably best avoided in these patients. At St Vincent’s Hospital in Melbourne, patients receiving antipsychotic therapy have their metabolic markers assessed at admission and at regular intervals after that, including measuring their serum prolactin. “Hyperprolactinaemia is a significant problem and should be monitored every six months if it is elevated or increasing particularly if there are symptoms then either reduce the dose or change antipsychotic or add in low dose aripiprazole which will lower prolactin levels,” Dr Warden explained.   Dr Matthew Warden spoke on the “Management of Metabolic Dysregulation in Patients on Antipsychotics” at the Healthed, Mental Health in General Practice Evening Seminar held in Sydney in June, 2018.

Dr Jenny Robson

Mycoplasma genitalium (M. genitalium), is thought to affect up to 400,000 Australians. It causes urethritis in men, and in women it can lead to pelvic inflammatory disease, cervicitis and preterm labour. It is also a recognised cause of anorectal proctitis along with other infections including Chlamydia trachomatis (including the LGV strains), gonorrhoea, syphilis, HSV and shigellosis. Asymptomatic infection is also common. Who to test Only test those with symptoms and their contacts. Screening asymptomatic people for M. genitalium is not currently recommended. Diagnosis Females: PCR on endocervical or vaginal swab, first pass urine (FPU), ThinPrep -collected by cervical brush/swab. Males: PCR on urethral swab (in preference to FPU), anorectal swabs. Throat swabs are not recommended as pharyngeal infection is uncommon. Transport: Ambient temperature; if there is any delay from collection to transport to the laboratory, the sample must be refrigerated Current treatment recommendations Preliminary data from the patient populations suggests resistance rates to macrolides may be as high as 64 per cent. The highest rates are likely to be in the men who have sex with men (MSM) population. Although information regarding fluoroquinolone resistance (moxifloxacin) is not available with this test, some studies suggest resistance to fluoroquinolones is present in 10–15% of infections. Doxycycline alone is ineffective in two-thirds of infections but will lower bacterial load in most cases, increasing the likelihood of cure with a subsequent antibiotic. Pretreating M. genitalium infections with doxycycline for one week and then treating susceptible infections with azithromycin and macrolide-resistant infections with a fluoroquinolone eradicates >90% of infections. Current treatment regimens Macrolide sensitive Doxycycline 100mg bd for seven days followed by azithromycin 1g stat then 500mg daily for three days (total 2.5g) OR Doxycycline 100mg bd for seven days followed by azithromycin 1g single dose. It is not known to what extent the improved outcomes resulting from the use of doxycycline followed by 2.5g azithromycin are due to this dose of azithromycin, rather than simply the pre-treatment with doxycycline. The higher dose of azithromycin requires a private prescription. Macrolide resistant Doxycycline 100mg bd for seven days followed by moxifloxacin 400mg daily for seven days. A longer course of moxifloxacin may be required in women with pelvic inflammatory disease. Moxifloxacin requires a private prescription, cannot be used in pregnancy and is expensive. It is associated with diarrhoea, occasional tendinopathy and rare neurological and cardiac events. Treatment failures following appropriate fluoroquinolone treatment may require specialist advice. Additional actions Advise no sex without condoms until tested for cure (14 days after completion of treatment). Advise no sex with untested previous sexual partners. Test of cure Test of cure by PCR should be done at least two weeks after treatment is completed i.e. four weeks after commencing therapy. Contact tracing In heterosexuals, the risk of PID and reproductive complications suggests a greater need to trace, test and treat infected contacts. The time period for contact tracing is unknown. Asymptomatic infection and macrolide resistance are more common in MSM and there is only limited evidence that this is harmful. As moxifloxacin will probably be required for treatment, contact tracing may be best confined to continuing partners of a symptomatic person.   References: Australian STI Management Guidelines for Use in Primary Care http://www.sti.guidelines.org.au/sexually-transmissible-infections/mycoplasma-genitalium#management Australian Contact Tracing Manual contacttracing.ashm.org.au/conditions/when-contact-tracing-is-recommended/mycoplasma-genitalium   General Practice Pathology is a new regular column each authored by an Australian expert pathologist on a topic of particular relevance and interest to practising GPs. The authors provide this editorial, free of charge as part of an educational initiative developed and coordinated by Sonic Pathology.